There are a few reasons why I rarely accept self-published fiction titles at Pop Syndicate: Most are typically poorly edited, poorly written concepts that leave the reading side of my brain twitching for hours afterward. My reviewers refuse to try anymore because of some of the really, really bad ones we've received.
The main reason, however, is the overwhelmingly ugly, vicious and over-inflated egos that come along with the self-published book. I am shocked at some of the downright rude, obnoxious, toxic behavior I see from these authors.
Self-published fiction authors tend to want the world - for nothing. I've had them make demands that would put JLo to shame. Based on the quantity of emails I tend to receive from them, you'd think my entire life revolved around their one-day virtual book tour slot.
The thing is, it isn't just one or two who need attitude adjustments; this is a pattern that remains consist, despite my hopes to the contrary. (Not every author, but enough to make it matter.)
Of course, the ones who make the most idiotic demands are the ones who are never on time with their virtual book tour interview questions or guest blog. (Apparently, deadlines only apply to me in their comfy little world.)
So it was with little surprise that Henry Baum of the Self Publishing Review community shared a link on Twitter to a review where relatives of the author took umbrage.
These spiteful people tossed insults and questioned the reviewer Carol Buchanan's credibility - who has a PhD and wrote a really fair review. (Read the comments to see why I specifically mention PhD.) Baum checked the emails of the commenters and quickly discovered that they had the same last name as the author - and had used fake names for the public - something he shared with readers.
Of course, I could not let this slide. I had to leave my own two-cents - which, for the most part, was pretty tactful. (Aren't you proud of me?)
After reading this, I thought it was time for a reminder to authors that sometimes, reviewers just aren't that into you - for whatever reason.
If you have hot-headed relatives who want to duel anyone who doesn't like your stuff, tie them to a chair until they understand that their attitude reflects poorly on YOU. It could cost you sales and future reviews at ANY blog. (ehm... Alice Hoffman.) If you, the author, are the culprit, go buy yourself a journal, a fancy pen and some chocolate and furiously scribble the death warrants of every reviewer who didn't like your work - then burn the journal to exercise the revenge demons from your system.
If you are smart, once you get over the emotional toll of a bad review, you will sit down and seriously read what the reviewers had to say. Those that give examples from your work could provide valuable details that will make your next novel even better.
If you haven't already, check out my Etiquette Week post, How to Respond to Bad Reviews for tips to avoid blunders like those at the Self Publishing Review.
NOTE: Not all self-published titles are stinkers. Not all self-published authors are egotists. Unfortunately, this is a continuing trend I see in self-published fiction authors. These authors make it difficult for the terrific writers who know how to network. If you know an author who is acting stupid, take them to task and set them straight on proper ways to deal with bad reviews.





I am a self-published author, and I hope that I don’t have the ego thing! In fact, I keep hoping for a bad review on one of my books. The two novels I have published so far have received great reviews. While I am glad people like my work, I know that it can’t be perfect. I would like to get a bad review so that I know what I need to work on.
Interested in giving me a bad review???? LOL!
Sadly enough, this is so true.
I would also add that many self-published authors over-react to various experiences as a result of the truth settling in–that is ALL writers, whether traditionally or self-published have to work our buns off.
Thanks so much.
Thanks for pointing out that not all self published authors are stinkers. Some of them (us) self publish because they (I) own a media corporation, have worked in publishing for a length of time and relish the idea of being able to self direct their (my) work.
That said, as a former professional reviewer for major publishing houses, I’ll agree that *a lot* of self published books are horrid. In this age of POD, everyone’s a writer – or thinks they are. Perish the thought of formal training, professional development or heaven forbid, an editor.
But again – not all of us behave so badly. Some of us hire proof readers, an editor, a professional cover artist, even a graphics designer so our book doesn’t seem quite so haphazard or cookie cutter.
In all, good post. Thanks.
Thanks for your comment, Jo Lynne! I was hoping I was clear enough that not all self-pubbed have issues with professionalism. The sad thing is, this issue at Self Publishing Review is STILL going on – with even more insults.
Thanks for reading!
Angela
Thanks for the comment, Anjuelle!
I think part of the problem is that some self-pubbed authors go into it with big ideas – usually those they’ve gotten during a sales pitch stating they will make millions and be the next Nicholas Sparks – without the publisher.
Most are new to publishing and don’t understand what vanity publishing is, and they also don’t have a clue about criticism. If Mom and Dad like it, then it should SELL!!
Thanks again for reading!
Angela
Oh WOW. I can say one thing positive about self-publishers with monster egos: if we didn’t have them, we would’ve have such entertaining internet escapades as shown by your posts!
Lacombe Responds to Reviewer Bashing | Market My Novel // Sep 18, 2009 at 6:46 pm
[...] like Alice Hoffman who take reviewer bashing to a whole new level. I also reminded authors in How Big Is Your EGO? to tell relatives not to be destructive in comments toward reviewers who were just not into their [...]