<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Market My Novel &#187; google book search settlement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketmynovel.com/tag/google-book-search-settlement/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketmynovel.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Librarians Want Close Monitoring of Google Books Settlement</title>
		<link>http://marketmynovel.com/2009/05/librarians-want-close-monitoring-of-google-books-settlement.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=librarians-want-close-monitoring-of-google-books-settlement</link>
		<comments>http://marketmynovel.com/2009/05/librarians-want-close-monitoring-of-google-books-settlement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>awilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market My Novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google book search settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[librarians challenge google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market my novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing my novel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.63.250/~marketmy/site/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's monopoly of digitized books is still raising concerns from publishing industry insiders, as well as those watching from the virtual wings. Most recently, librarians have asked the judge in the Google Book Settlement case to order strict oversight of the program and make sure Google doesn't charge exorbitant fees to access digitized tomes. The New York Times sums up...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarketmynovel.com%2F2009%2F05%2Flibrarians-want-close-monitoring-of-google-books-settlement.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarketmynovel.com%2F2009%2F05%2Flibrarians-want-close-monitoring-of-google-books-settlement.html&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Google&#39;s monopoly of digitized books is still raising concerns from publishing industry insiders, as well as those watching from the virtual wings.</p>
<p>Most recently, librarians have asked the judge in the Google Book Settlement case to order strict oversight of the program and make sure Google doesn&#39;t charge exorbitant fees to access digitized tomes.<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/04/libraries-ask-judge-to-monitor-google-books-settlement/" target="_blank"> <em>The New York Times </em></a><em>s</em>ums up concerns raised by the American Library Association and two other groups:</p>
<div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">Several other groups <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/opposition-to-google-books-settlement/">have raised issues</a> about the Google settlement, including concerns that it would grant Google a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/technology/internet/04books.html">monopoly over millions of “orphan works”</a> — books whose authors cannot be found or whose rights holders are unknown. The Justice Department has opened an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/technology/internet/29google.html">inquiry into possible antitrust issues</a> related to the deal.</div>
<p>The Electronic Frontier Foundation &#8211; the ACLU of the net &#8211; says it is working with authors who oppose the Google deal, which is supported by the Association of American Publishers and Author&#39;s Guide.</p>
<p>The found of the <a href="http://www.archive.org/" target="_blank">Internet Archive</a>, Brewster Kahle, criticized the settlement and the publishing industry&#39;s lack of focus for the future. Here are some of Kahle&#39;s comments, as reported at <a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/dneedle/2009/05/internet-archive-guy-slams-pro.html" target="_blank">InternetNews.com</a>: </p>
<p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">“It creates another monopoly,” said Kahle. “It doesn’t make sense for them to be locked up by Google, it’s very screwy.” </p>
<p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">Going forward he warned the settlement might “determine the future of books and paid content.” </p>
<p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">In response to a question, Kahle, a successful entrepreneur, took<br />
pains to say he’s not about making everything free. He thinks the<br />
publishing industry needs a new distribution system that would enable<br />
the “vending and lending” of online works. </p>
<p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">He said he wants to be optimistic a new system will emerge, but so<br />
far “fhe book publishing industry has done almost everything it can to<br />
kill itself.” </p>
<p><strong>More on the Web:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/technology/internet/04books.html?_r=1" target="_blank">Google&#39;s Plan for Out-of-Print Books is Challenged</a></p>
<p><a href="http://books.google.com/googlebooks/agreement/" target="_blank">Google Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marketmynovel.com/2009/05/librarians-want-close-monitoring-of-google-books-settlement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

